Somersett Technical Restraining Order (TRO) Court Decision

On 22 December the Reno court ruled against continuing the TRO against the Somersett Owners Association (SOA). The court found that the group of homeowners that sued had other legal remedies to pursue (They have other grounds to sue the SOA on.) BUT that the owners definitely had cause and likely would prevail against the SOA. A good read.

Here is the court decision:
12.22.14_Order_Denying_Issuance_of_Preliminary_Injunction

Here is our original blog about the golf course goings-on at Somersett: Save the Somersett Golf Course! Oh, oh!

Advertisements
This entry was posted in CIC Governance, Law Suits, Somersett and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Somersett Technical Restraining Order (TRO) Court Decision

  1. Paul Burkett says:

    The Somersett Legal Decision and the Ballot process for approval of their purchase of the golf course asset should be carefully reviewed by all to make sure that the ACHOA follows the intent of the NRS statutes. All parties should honor the process as the ACHOA community reviews the options concerning ownership and operation of “The Club At ArrowCreek”. I am looking forward to reviewing and reading the facts concerning the potential purchase.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s