How Do You Spell NDA? How Did the ACHOA Spell NDA?

NDA is an acronym that stands for Non-Disclosure Agreement (or NonDisclosure Agreement) that is also known as a confidentiality agreement (CA), confidential disclosure agreement (CDA), proprietary information agreement (PIA), or secrecy agreement (SA).

If you want to read more about what NDAs are or what they are supposed to contain, continue reading below. Otherwise, click here to get to the pertinent ArrowCreek information.

According to wikipedia, an NDA is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties. It is a contract through which the parties agree not to disclose information covered by the agreement. An NDA creates a confidential relationship between the parties to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or trade secrets. As such, an NDA protects nonpublic business information.

NDAs are commonly signed when two companies, individuals, or other entities (such as partnerships, societies, etc.) are considering doing business and need to understand the processes used in each other’s business for the purpose of evaluating the potential business relationship. NDAs can be “mutual”, meaning both parties are restricted in their use of the materials provided, or they can restrict the use of material by a single party.

Types of NDAs

A non-disclosure agreement may be unilateral or bilateral, that is, it may bind only one party or multiple parties (typically two):

Unilateral NDA

A unilateral, or a one-way, agreement is where one party wants to disclose certain information to another party but needs the information to remain secret for some reason, perhaps due to secrecy requirements required to satisfy patent laws[More info in Understanding Confidentiality Agreements] or to make sure that the other party does not take and use the disclosed information without compensating the discloser.

Bilateral NDA

A bilateral, or mutual, agreement is where both parties will be supplying information that is intended to remain secret. This type of agreement is common when businesses are considering some kind of joint venture or merger.

Some practitioners insist on a mutual NDA in all cases, to encourage the drafter to make the provisions “fair and balanced” in case the drafter’s receiving-party client later ends up as a disclosing party, or vice versa (not an uncommon occurrence.

Content of NDAs

A nondisclosure agreement can protect any type of information that is not generally known. However, nondisclosure agreements may also contain clauses that will protect the person receiving the information so that if they lawfully obtained the information through other sources they would not be obligated to keep the information secret.[2][dead link] In other words, the nondisclosure agreement typically only requires the receiving party to maintain information in confidence when that information has been directly supplied by the disclosing party. Ironically, however, it is sometimes easier to get a receiving party to sign a simple agreement that is shorter, less complex and does not contain safety provisions protecting the receiver.[citation needed]

Some common issues addressed in an NDA include:[from Overview of Confidentiality Agreements]

  • outlining the parties to the agreement;
  • the definition of what is confidential, i.e. the information to be held confidential. Modern NDAs will typically include a laundry list of types of items which are covered, including unpublished patent applications, know-how, schema, financial information, verbal representations, customer lists, vendor lists, business practices/strategies, etc.;
  • the disclosure period – information not disclosed during the disclosure period (e.g., one year after the date of the NDA) is not deemed confidential;
  • the exclusions from what must be kept confidential. Typically, the restrictions on the disclosure or use of the confidential data will be invalid if
    • the recipient had prior knowledge of the materials;
    • the recipient gained subsequent knowledge of the materials from another source;
    • the materials are generally available to the public; or
    • the materials are subject to a subpoena – although many practitioners regard that fact as a category of permissible disclosure, not as a categorical exclusion from confidentiality (because court-ordered secrecy provisions may apply even in case of a subpoena). In any case, a subpoena would more likely than not override a contract of any sort;
  • provisions restricting the transfer of data in violation of national security;
  • the term and conditions (in years) of the confidentiality, i.e. the time period of confidentiality;
  • the term (in years) the agreement is binding;
  • permission to obtain ex-parte injunctive relief;
  • description of the actions need to be done with the confidential materials upon agreement ending;
  • the obligations of the recipient regarding the confidential information, typically including some version of obligations:
    • to use the information only for enumerated purposes;
    • to disclose it only to persons with a need to know the information for those purposes;
    • to use appropriate efforts (not less than reasonable efforts) to keep the information secure. Reasonable efforts is often defined as a standard of care relating to confidential information that is no less rigorous than that which the recipient uses to keep its own similar information secure; and
    • to ensure that anyone to whom the information is disclosed further abides by obligations restricting use, restricting disclosure, and ensuring security at least as protective as the agreement; and
  • types of permissible disclosure – such as those required by law or court order (many NDAs require the receiving party to give the disclosing party prompt notice of any efforts to obtain such disclosure, and possibly to cooperate with any attempt by the disclosing party to seek judicial protection for the relevant confidential information).
  • the law and jurisdiction governing the parties. The parties may choose exclusive jurisdiction of a court of a country.

ArrowCreek HOA NDAs

All that being said, the NDAs (Non-Disclosure Agreements) between the ArrowCreek Home Owners’ Association (ACHOA) and Arnold Palmer Golf Management (APGM) and the ACHOA and the Friends of ArrowCreek (FOA) have been finally released to the members of the ArrowCreek HOA. Here are the two NDAs governing the ArrowCreek HOA’s relationship with those two entities. Read them and note how comfortable you are that the ACHOA Board of Directors have your interests in hand. Read them and weep.

The NDA obtained July 24, 2015 by the Concerned Neighbors of ArrowCreek (CNA) between the ACHOA with APGM was signed August 1, 2014, — before the golf club went to bankruptcy court. It is here.

The NDA obtained by CNA on July 30, 2015, between the ACHOA and the FOA was signed April 6, 2015, and is here.

The Letter of Intent was signed December 5, 2014 between ACHOA BOD and FOA. It is available on the ArrowCreek HOA website if you login with your memberid. Section 4 of the agreement discusses the “signed Purchase Agreement must be executed no later than May 31, 2015 at 5:00 pm, or at a later date to be agreed upon in writing by the Parties. The close of escrow will take place no later than ninety (90) days after execution of the Purchase Agreement.”


There has been no Purchase Agreement nor approved ACHOA Governing Documents to this date, at least as far as these homeowner authors are aware of. There has been no voting. We have heard of a proposal (that the ACHOA attorney has already charged the HOA for reviewing), but it hasn’t surfaced to normal owners yet.

This entry was posted in ACHOA, APG, Arnold Palmer Golf Management, ArrowCreek, ArrowCreek Community Club, NDA, The Club at ArrowCreek and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to How Do You Spell NDA? How Did the ACHOA Spell NDA?

  1. Ronald Duncan says:

    Now that we’ve seen the NDA between the ACHOA and FOA, no ACHOA Board meeting was needed to put this in place, versus that requirement for a Letter of Intent. There are a few key factors you should be aware of:
    This latest NDA, put in place seven (7) weeks before the expiration of the Letter of Intent to purchase the golf course and create a Joint Venture, only proves that the ACHOA Board is intent on pursuing the acquisition, nothing more. The NDA fails to cover data prior to 6 April 2015 and it does not identify that on-going negotiations with the FOA are subject to this NDA.
    Secrecy abounds within our ACHOA!
    Ron Duncan


  2. Ronald Duncan says:

    From my perspective, as a former Program Manager with contracts, cost and delivery responsibility, there are three areas where someone put the hens in the Fox house.
    1.) The NDA doesn’t specify how the ‘confidential’ data is to be labeled. So, it could be virtually anything that Palmer Management wishes to suddenly label as confidential, including staff names.
    2.) Section 3.c – You cannot use the information from APG/PM for the purposes of soliciting outside bids. During one of the ACCC meetings ACHOA Board members mentioned they would use the ‘knowledge’ to get competitive lease information. This would put the ACHOA at RISK.
    3.) When the concept of an agreement was brought up last October, I noted during the ACHOA Board meeting that we shouldn’t sign an agreement with PM if it specified the agreement was to be handled under Texas Law! Since the agreement was ALREADY signed, I guess the Texans pulled one over on the less than crafty Fox.
    4.) It does not cover, nor imply in any way, a ‘negotiation!’ It is merely for the collection and analysis of data. So, if someone says they are ‘negotiating’ under this agreement, it is not covered by this NDA. Palmer can supply data but questioning its validity is not permitted under Section 3.e.

    Ron Duncan


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.