Attention ArrowCreek Homeowners: Somersett Golf Course Financials

As some ArrowCreek residents are already aware, the owners in the Northwestern Reno Development of Somersett have been going through some similar activities to those of ArrowCreek. Today’s Somersett United blog discusses a further presentation of the 5 year plan for their amenities and the woes of their golf course financials.

“In response to a homeowner comment on the Canyon Nine Pipeline post inquiring, “Any thoughts of raising fees for course usage to cover the cost of course maintenance”, the following data derived from the SOA 2015 Budget is offered.

  • Annual operating expenses for Canyon Nine – $324K
  • Annual revenue realized from Canyon Nine – $41K
  • Monthly unit assessment to support Canyon Nine – $10

Given the above it is obvious that raising usage fees to cover a $283K deficit is not practical.  As with all Association amenities Canyon Nine is not self supporting and therefore reliant on homeowner assessments.”

The whole Somersett United message is here.

Looks like a special assessment may be in the near future for Somersett homeowners.

PAY ATTENTION, ARROWCREEK HOMEOWNERS!!

Posted in ArrowCreek411, Golf, Golf Developments, Somersett | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

RGJ: Sparks Votes to Drop Kiley Ranch Golf Course

The Reno Gazette Journal article by Chanelle Bessette (cbessette@rgj.com) reports that the Sparks City Council voted unanimously to drop the 2003 previously – approved plans for a golf course and 338 residential units in Kiley Ranch.

The City Council agenda item said that the property owners of Kiley Ranch requested to abandon the planned development handbook because the property will never be developed according to the plans first approved in 2003.

The original plan in the 2003 handbook was to develop the area’s 279 acres into a golf course and 338 residential units with the remaining land left as open space. After the handbook’s approval, however, the city decided to not develop the golf course. The parcels currently remain vacant and there has been no development or improvement of the land.

The three property owners that make up Kiley Ranch include Rising Tides LLC, Golden Triangle LLC and the Kiley Ranch Preservancy Foundation.

Presenting before Sparks City Council were senior city planner Karen Melby and Rising Tides LLC representative Lois Brown.

“Nothing has happened (in terms of development),” Brown said. “There’s no appetite for anyone to pay for a golf course.”

The western properties owned by Rising Tides LLC are planned to be incorporated into the Kiley Ranch North Planned Development, the agenda item said.

The wetland parcels north of Spanish Springs Diversion Dam and west of Vista Boulevard are owned by the Kiley Ranch Preservancy Foundation and will remain as wetlands and open space. The three parcels owned by Golden Triangle LLC are anticipated to be developed as a mix of residential and commercial land uses.

See article here .

Posted in ArrowCreek411, Golf, Golf Developments | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The ArrowCreek July-August 2015 Newsletter is Available

See the new newsletter here: ArrowCreek Newsletter Page

Posted in ArrowCreek, ArrowCreek Newsletter | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Come See the Art Show Today!

The ArrowCreek Art Show “Art on the Greens” is quite busy right now! Come see all the buzz! Great music! We will be here until 7 tonight! Not much time left! Artown LogoLots of great paintings, glassware and unusual art objects to be seen! Most of the ArrowCreek artists have been busy for weeks.

20150712_11531620150712_115220 20150712_16594320150712_17001820150712_11521020150712_12465720150712_11485120150712_12005120150712_11535020150712_124640


ArrowCreek Art Guild is proud to be an official activity of Reno’s Artown for the first time. Plan to come over to see the one-day show on Sunday, July 12, 2015 from 11 am – 7 pm. There will be art to view and buy, food, wine, music and golf. Putt your way to some raffle tickets for awesome prizes. Raffle tickets are available for sale as well.

More details here on-line at the Artown website.

coverJul12Listing

Artown TCAAC-01

ART_TwentyYearLogo_FThe ArrowCreek Art Guild is proud to be part of the 20th Anniversary of Artown and the July 2015 Festival. The month-long summer arts festival features approximately 500 events produced by more than 100 cultural organizations and businesses in locations citywide. Artown receives major funding from the City of Reno, and is sponsored by U.S. Bank, NV Energy, IGT, Grand Sierra Resort, University of Nevada, Reno, Wild River Grille, Washoe County, Reno Tahoe USA, Fox 11 News 4 and My21TV, Reno Media Group, RGJ Media, KUNR Public Radio and KNPB Public Television. Additional support is received from the Nevada Arts Council and the National Endowment for the Arts.

PDF File for printing

Posted in ArrowCreek Art Guild, ArrowCreek411, Art, Art Show, ArTown | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

ArrowCreek Owners: Where Are You?

By Dan Carrick (Original post is on the Voices to the Webmaster page)

I attended the ACHOA Community Meeting this past Tuesday evening (July 7) and was struck by the way I have emotionally responded to what was presented. Let’s just say that I am irritated, irritated by the ACBOD, FOA and the approximately 900 property owners who weren’t there.

Ostensibly this was a meeting of the AC Communications Committee representing the interests of the HOA.

It is my opinion that only the interests of the FOA were represented.

The advertised thrust of the meeting was to discuss the alternatives to having a golf course environment by transitioning the two golf courses to become brown native open space, a park-like environment with trees, pavilions, etc. to possibly having outdoor sports incorporated which would charge money to the public for participation.

The presentation was moderated by a professor at UNR and had as participants a landscape representative of Moana Nursery and the Washoe County Operations Superintendent (Parks & Rec). The purpose of the professor was to be a neutral person, the purpose of Washoe County was to discuss what failed golf courses were turned into and how they are managed and Moana discussed the estimated cost of going brown or conversion to another purpose (spreadsheet identified it was prepared for FOA).

The short synopsis is that nobody would ever want an expensive park which would charge money and be open to the public and it was shown to be clear that it’s much more cost effective to purchase the current golf club than doing anything else including a return to nature.

This whole exercise was a sham! I assume paid for by the HOA, you know, us, to positively show us that the FOA needs to be bought out!

Nowhere was there a whiff of the option of encouraging the FOA to become a raging success. Clearly it isn’t an option to the ACHOA BOD. Why not? Who drives these people to pursue what a whole lot of home owners don’t want. Is there any daylight between the BOD and the FOA? I really don’t understand what’s going on here; it’s enough to make me a drunken conspiracy theorist.

I have tried to attend as many of the HOA presentations and monthly meetings as possible. What has become clear is that participation in these community meetings is heavily weighted to people who have golf interests. Based on this past meeting I would say it’s probably 90% golf, 10% non golf. Someone stood up and pointed out that when a pro-golf person speaks it’s followed by clapping, when somebody else speaks it’s silence, sometimes with an air of disapproval (I am paraphrasing).

It’s clear to me that these community meetings are just sales pitches that will lead to only one conclusion. Somebody the other night wanted some hard numbers of what it means to our monthly fees. Well, so far the only answer is that nobody knows yet but it’s being worked on. Let’s face it, the hard number won’t be presented until the FOA finishes it’s sales campaign and the membership has been softened up a bit.

OK, here is my other gripe: People out there, where are you? What is this apathy?

I don’t understand it. Don’t you care? I personally am conflicted, it may well turn out that buying the property and leasing to APMG is the correct answer going forward, it may not. But why don’t you participate? Quite frankly the ACHOA BOD really only hears approval or disapproval of their actions from the golf interests. Is it such that if the HOA comes to you and wants a bump of any amount of money, say $10.00/mo., the answer is automatically NO! Well, that might not be very bright either, would it?

I would like to hear from others out there. Why aren’t you at these meetings?

Thanks

Dan Carrick

Posted in ACHOA, APG, ArrowCreek, ArrowCreek HOA, ArrowCreek411, Communication, Community, FOA, Friends of ArrowCreek, Golf, Golf at ArrowCreek, Golf Course Purchase, HOA, The Club at ArrowCreek | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

FOA – ACHOA Letter of Intent Date Not Extended — But We’re Still Secretly In Discussions

Mr. Fox and Ms Tarantino:

This is a most interesting paper trail and leads one to surmise there is not only a severe communication problem here in ArrowCreek but there is also an alarming lack of transparency.

Here is the paper trail regarding ACHOA and intent to purchase this community’s golf courses.

7/1/15  Ms. Tarantino sends an email to Ron Duncan, et al and states:
“Lastly, the FOA Letter of Intent has been mutually extended to allow the ACHOA Board to finish its due diligence and vetting process. The ACHOA will report the results of this due diligence at an appropriate time when completed.”

7/2/15  Mr. Fox sends an email to Wayne Krachun, et al, stating: “The LOI expired in May and has not been extended.”

7/7/15  Ms. Tarantino sends an email to Wayne Krachun, Ron Duncan, et al, stating:  “The Letter of Intent between the ArrowCreek Homeowners Association, Inc. and the Friends of ArrowCreek, L.L. C. expired on May 31, 2015 and has not been extended.  However, both parties are operating under a Non-Disclosure Agreement concerning financial information and business propositions.”

First the deal is on (7/1/15), then it is off (7/2/15), then it is “secretly” on (7/7/15).  This is an unacceptable manner for an HOA Board to conduct business and it appears to show a lack of regard for what the majority of AC homeowners want the Board to pursue. It also seems to demonstrate a lack of transparency and integrity on behalf of our Board.  We only found out about the current “previously secret” negotiations because of persistent AC resident questioning.

Mr. Fox, you and your fellow Board members need to LISTEN to what the majority of AC residents want in terms of golf course purchase here in ArrowCreek and cease and desist in trying to “bail out” the FOA.  They were not authorized to make this purchase on behalf of our community; let’s quit acting like that is the case.

I can see why Ms. Tarantino sent her first email stating the FOA Letter of Intent was mutually extended.  By all outward appearances (the ACHOA Board’s behavior of operating under a Non-Disclosure Agreement), one would think the letter had been extended.  The difference is, the Board apparently decided not to reveal their endeavor to pursue purchase of the FOA golf courses to the AC residents.

It is also disappointing that in Mr. Fox’s email to Mr. Krachun et al, on 7/2/15, Mr. Fox failed to disclose that the ACHOA Board was continuing to pursue golf course purchase, via a Non-Disclosure Agreement.  This is a serious and alarming example of “omission” of information and leads one to believe perhaps Mr. Fox did not want AC residents to know about the Board’s continued endeavors to purchase of the AC golf courses.

We implore this ACHOA Board to stop pursuing purchase of the AC Golf courses from the FOA and let free enterprise take its course.  More simply put, “butt out of what is not your business”.

Thank you,

Margaret McConnell

Posted in ACHOA, ArrowCreek, ArrowCreek HOA, Communication, FOA, Friends of ArrowCreek, Golf at ArrowCreek, Golf Course Purchase, The Club at ArrowCreek | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Analysis of Golf Course Closure Impacts on Home Sales Price Trends

Obviously some folks last night at the ACHOA Communications Committee Informational Meeting haven’t paid attention to this study; I repeat it here. Not that there is any chance that they would read it on their own but to make it easier for any of the AC411 readers to point it out as they see fit. There was no preconceived conclusion given as guidance to Mr. Bonnefant at the beginning of the study so the conclusions are his professional ones alone – based on his extensive expertise.

arrowcreek411's avatarArrowCreek411

Brian Bonnenfant, Project Manager for the Center for Regional Studies, College of Business at the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR), was commissioned by The Concerned Neighbors of ArrowCreek (CNA) to do the Analysis of Golf Course Closure Impacts on Home Sales Price Trends study and report. It reviews property values of D’Andrea and Northgate prior to and post golf course closure. You are welcome to review it and draw your own conclusions; however, after the closing of the golf courses, property value trends follow economic trends with no difference noted between those properties adjacent to the golf course and those that are not.

Single‐family properties directly adjacent to the D’Andrea and Northgate golf course land were analyzed for property value trends before and after the closure of their respective golf courses to determine the impacts of the golf course closures on property values. The analysis is based on transactions that…

View original post 129 more words

Posted in ArrowCreek, Brian Bonnenfant, D’Andrea, Golf, Golf Course Closure, Home Sales, Home Values, Northgate Golf Course, Reno, University of Nevada - Reno, UNR, Washoe County | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NRS 116.31035

NRS 116.31035  Publications containing mention of candidate or ballot question: Requirements; limitations.

1.  If an official publication contains
any mention of a candidate or ballot question, the official publication must, upon request and under the same terms and conditions, provide equal space to all candidates or to a representative of an organization which supports the passage or defeat of the ballot question.

2.  If an official publication contains the views or opinions of the association, the executive board, a community manager or an officer, employee or agent of an association concerning an issue of official interest, the official publication must, upon request and under the same terms and conditions, provide equal space to opposing views and opinions of a unit’s owner of the common-interest community.

3.  If an association has a closed-circuit television station and that station interviews, or provides time to, a candidate or a representative of an organization which supports the passage or defeat of a ballot question, the closed-circuit television station must, under the same terms and conditions, allow equal time for all candidates or a representative of an opposing view to the ballot question.

4.  The association and its officers, employees and agents are immune from criminal or civil liability for any act or omission which arises out of the publication or disclosure of any information related to any person and which occurs in the course of carrying out any duties required pursuant to subsection 1, 2 or 3.

5.  As used in this section:

(a) “Issue of official interest” means:

(1) Any issue on which the executive board or the units’ owners will be voting, including, without limitation, elections; and

(2) The enactment or adoption of rules or regulations that will affect the common-interest community.

(b) “Official publication” means:

(1) An official website; [Read that as the Associa ACHOA website where the notice is.]
(2) An official newsletter or other similar publication [Read that as the Associa ACHOA email blitz for the notice and reminder] that is circulated to each unit’s owner; or

(3) An official bulletin board that is available to each unit’s owner.

Posted in NRS 116.31035 | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Investing In Troubled Golf Courses

By Sarah Max, New York Times

JULY 7, 2014

When the Gaillardia Golf and Country Club opened in 1998, it was to be the crown jewel of golf in Oklahoma City, complete with an 18-hole P.G.A. championship course and a 55,000-square-foot clubhouse of Norman-style architecture. The Gaylord family, best known as Oklahoma media moguls and owners of the Grand Ole Opry, sank a reported $59 million into the project.

Over the next 15 years, however, the course changed hands and fell into disrepair as a glut of new courses and declining demand punished the market. Finally, early this year, Gaillardia was sold to Concert Golf Partners, an investment firm based in Newport Beach, Calif., which assumed $7 million in loans and now owns the property free and clear.

“Between 1998 and 2005 there would have been a bidding war,” said Peter Nanula, the chairman of Concert Golf who previously ran Arnold Palmer Golf Management.

While golf is still anathema to many investment portfolios, investors who have the cash see the current market as an opportunity to scoop up distressed clubs and revamp their business models.

“It’s certainly a buyer’s market,” said Larry Hirsh, president of Golf Property Analysts. “There are a lot of distressed courses, financing is difficult and most buyers don’t have the ability to write a check.”

Valuations for golf courses — and golf course debt — have been slow to recover even as most asset classes have recovered from the financial crisis. Last year was the eighth consecutive year of net club closings, according to the National Golf Foundation, with 157 closings and 14 openings. Most existing courses, meanwhile, are still worth far less than they were before the recession.

Several factors have been dragging down the industry, experts say, including changing family dynamics, overbuilding in the late 1990s and an absence of lenders.

In 2007, the three big players in this area — GE Capital, Textron and Capmark — had more than $2 billion in golf loans outstanding, which were already in decline, Mr. Nanula said. In 2012, that number was just $500 million. Today, what lending is done is extremely fragmented, with interest rates starting about 7 percent and loan-to-value ratios around 50 percent, compared with 90 percent before the recession.

“It would be like if Wells Fargo and Chase suddenly quit making home loans,” he said, noting that lenders left the market for a variety of reasons, not all of them related to loan performance.

A golfer on a fairway at the Gaillardia Country Club. Concert Golf Partners bought the property after it fell into foreclosure.

But that has opened the door for investors like Mr. Nanula, who raised his $50 millionprivate equity fund in 2012 and has since bought eight golf course clubs and loans. In 2013, the asset management giantFortress Investment Group began financing Arcis Equity Partners, a Dallas-based private equity firm that specializes in leisure. In March, Tower Three Partners of Greenwich, Conn., took a majority stake in the Heritage Golf Group, an owner and operator of premier private, resort and daily fee golf properties.

Foreign investors are also joining the game. Heritage Est. St. Andrews, based in Luxembourg, recently formed a fund to invest in and enhance undervalued golf properties. Pacific Links International of Canada began acquiring clubs in 2012 and now owns 10 in the United States, bringing its network of owned, affiliate and reciprocal clubs to more than 100 worldwide.

Last September, the world’s largest owner and operator of private clubs, ClubCorp Holdings, went public at $14 a share. The Dallas-based company, which had been owned by the private equity firm KSL Capital Partners, has used the injection of capital to add to its portfolio of clubs and eventually pay off its high-yield debt. It now owns 109 golf and country clubs in 23 states and Mexico. Its shares climbed as high as $19.30 in May and closed at $18.63 on Thursday.

More golf courses are likely to close over the next couple of years, said Eric Affeldt, ClubCorp’s chief executive, but for the right clubs in the right markets, the tide is turning. “We sold more memberships last year than at any time over the last 10 years,” he said. “As capacity returns to a healthier level, things should only improve.”

Pacific Links International owns 10 clubs in the United States, including the Dove Canyon course in Orange County, Calif.

Though the housing boom and easy access to credit helped pave the way for hundreds of new courses, the buildup began decades earlier. From 1986 through 2005, about 4,200 net new golf courses were added in the United States, a 40 percent increase, according to the National Golf Foundation.

The biggest frenzy was in the late 1990s, Mr. Affeldt said, after an “erroneous report” said that the supply of golf courses would not be sufficient to accommodate retiring baby boomers. Between 1994 and 1999, the market added on average a net 343 courses a year.

What the projections did not account for, however, was changing behavior among retirees. “Prior to 2000, the assumption was that boomers would behave the same as retirees in the 1950s through 1990s — people would retire and get a membership at a golf club,” said Douglas Main, director of real estate consulting with Deloitte Transaction and Business Analytics. While plenty of baby boomers still love to golf, he said, many are working longer, traveling more and taking up other leisure activities.

Meanwhile, the younger set has not given the industry much of a bump. “The family dynamic has changed,” Mr. Hirsh said. “Dad’s not leaving for the golf course at 8 o’clock Saturday morning and coming home just in time for dinner.”

Consequently, for more than a decade, the number of rounds played has been down or flat.

Though the industry as a whole has been under a black cloud, not all clubs are losing money. The clubs that have held up best are those in densely populated areas with limited land on which to develop, Mr. Main noted. “You can have a club in Chicago doing better than one in Florida or Texas, even after you factor for the weather,” he said.

The worst off are those developed in the last 15 years as part of a residential community off the beaten path. “They’re relying solely on demand from that community,” Mr. Main added. Indeed, many of the new courses built during the housing boom were meant to be subsidized by home sales. When the bottom fell out of the housing market, developers had no way to pay for the expensive amenity. In many cases they defaulted on their loans, which are now getting scooped up by investors.

“Golf courses have high fixed costs,” Mr. Nanula said. “At a typical course, it’s at least $500,000 a year just to mow the grass.” Moreover, many clubs are mismanaged, he said. “The typical dynamic at a private club is that it’s not run with profit in mind but with the idea of making the place fabulous,” he said. As a result, he said, “we consistently see clubs that have no rhyme or reason on spending.”

As such, investors focus primarily on buying private clubs — annual and monthly dues are “stickier” than daily fees on public courses — and turning around the operations.

While the right location and management is crucial, the golf clubs that are doing well have also evolved from being golf centric to family centric. “It’s now golf with a small ‘g’ instead of a capital ‘G,’ ” Mr. Affeldt said, explaining that ClubCorp is refreshing food and beverage operations, relaxing dress codes and adding water parks, tennis courts and fitness facilities. Case in point: His home club, Brookhaven Country Club in Dallas. “Kids are playing putt-putt golf and running around in their bare feet while grandmas do water aerobics,” he said. “It’s the epitome of a multiuse, multigenerational club.”

The pool of buyers has improved considerably over the past year, said Jeff Woolson, managing director of CBRE’s golf and resort division, but that has not necessarily driven up prices.

Rather than base their offers on the value of the real estate, as many did in the past, buyers are focusing on the cash flow generated by the business. “This is a fundamental change,” Mr. Woolson said. “Prior to the recession, we didn’t even talk about gross revenue multipliers.”

Before the financial crisis, buyers were paying the equivalent of 11 to 14 times net income, he said. Now, the going rate for a well-run course is in line with other businesses, typically six to eight times net income, he said — assuming there is income.

The change is warranted, Mr. Woolson said, because most courses left on the market have deed restrictions that preclude developing them for other purposes. “Where people got into trouble was thinking golf is a real estate investment,” he said. “Golf courses are a real estate asset only insomuch as they use real estate in association with their business.”

In fact, golf courses typically cost more to build than they are worth. “They’re like new cars,” Mr. Hirsh added. “They’re worth less the minute you drive off the lot.”

See the article and accompanying pictures here .

Posted in APG, Arnold Palmer Golf Management, ArrowCreek, ArrowCreek411, ClubCorp, Golf, Golf Course Closure, Golf Course Purchase, Golf Industry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What A Concept!

The Club at ArrowCreek is half-way there! The twist of the name for a change is spot on. Now we just need a small group of Believers to either join in with the FOA or to buy from the FOA this private golf course. Then the rest of the ArrowCreek Community, the ArrowCreek Nonbelievers In Golf Course Ownership, will not worry about HOA special assessments for supporting the golfing or clubbing habits of a few for the remaining years of their lives in ArrowCreek.

Read this now! It has many familiar rings!!

Posted on February 21, 2015 by Times of Wayne County in Sports Blue Heron Hills Golf Club Becomes The Golf Club At Blue Heron Hills.

Posted in AC Golf Property Tax Burden, ArrowCreek Golf Property Tax Burden, ArrowCreek411, Assessment, FOA, Friends of ArrowCreek, Golf, Golf at ArrowCreek, Golf Course Purchase, The Club at ArrowCreek | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment